The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 11, 2014

Cornell Law School Research Paper No. 13-92

84 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2013 Last revised: 13 Aug 2015

Michael Frakes

Duke University School of Law

Melissa F. Wasserman

The University of Texas at Austin - School of Law

Date Written: July 18, 2013

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of user-fee financing structures of governmental agencies, little research has been conducted on the possible influence of such structures on agency decision-making. This paper attempts to fill this gap in the context of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). We first suggest that the PTO’s historical fee schedule and its reliance on patent grantees to subsidize patent applicants exposes the Agency to a risk that its obligatory costs will fall out of balance with its incoming fee collections. Second, we theorize the steps that the PTO may take in such instances in order to restore financial balance while allowing it to satisfy as many of its examination obligations as it can. In broad terms, we contend that a budget constrained PTO will distort its examination practices in an effort to increase the average fee income generated per application reviewed and/or to decrease the average examination costs incurred per application processed. We hypothesize that the PTO achieves these goals through the extension of preferential examination treatment — i.e., higher granting propensities and/or shorter wait times — to some technologies over others. Building on Frakes and Wasserman (2013), which had explored the PTO’s inflationary granting response, this paper draws on novel patent-processing data and presents evidence suggesting that the PTO will attempt to maintain as much aggregate application throughput as it can during times of financial strain by prioritizing the examination of applications within those technologies that cost the PTO the least to review.

Keywords: patents, patent law, administrative law, examination priority, grant, bias, budget, PTO, patent and trademark office

JEL Classification: K00, K39, H00, H60

Suggested Citation

Frakes, Michael and Wasserman, Melissa F., The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (July 18, 2013). Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 11, 2014; Cornell Law School Research Paper No. 13-92. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2295561 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2295561

Michael Frakes (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Melissa F. Wasserman

The University of Texas at Austin - School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton St
Austin, TX 78705
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
279
Rank
88,184
Abstract Views
1,252