Benefit/Flexible/Social Purpose Corporations: Comparison of Principal Features

4 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2013 Last revised: 20 Aug 2013

Cassady V. Brewer

Georgia State University - College of Law

Date Written: August 2013

Abstract

This chart provides a high-level comparison of the principal features (e.g., purpose, transparency, reporting, voting thresholds, etc.) across three variations of legislation relating to the new corporate forms for conducting social enterprise: legislation proposed by B Lab; legislation enacted by Delaware and Colorado; and legislation enacted in California (flexible purpose) and Washington (social purpose).

Keywords: benefit, flexible, social corporations, social enterprise

Suggested Citation

Brewer, Cassady V., Benefit/Flexible/Social Purpose Corporations: Comparison of Principal Features (August 2013). Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2296176 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2296176

Cassady V. Brewer (Contact Author)

Georgia State University - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
100
Rank
214,178
Abstract Views
485