The Promise of a Minimum Core Approach: The Colombian Model for Judicial Review of Austerity Measures

Economic and Social Rights after the Global Financial Crisis (Aoife Nolan, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2014), Forthcoming

FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 644

Posted: 24 Jul 2013

See all articles by David Landau

David Landau

Florida State University - College of Law

Date Written: July 2013

Abstract

This chapter will be published in a forthcoming edited volume on the enforcement of socio-economic rights since the global financial crisis. It uses the evolving jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court to argue that a minimum core approach to the enforcement of social rights may serve as a model for those courts currently wrestling with austerity measures in Europe and elsewhere. A minimum core approach, which prioritizes the basic needs of the poorest members of society, may be the most effective way for courts to protect the vulnerable during times of crisis without causing an overwhelming political backlash or freezing the status quo in the face of a genuine crisis. The Court has been guided by two key constitutional principles: the vital minimum doctrine, which gives all citizens a right to a basic level of subsistence, and the social state of law principle, which requires that the state construct and maintain a social safety net that prioritizes the poor. Recent jurisprudence, for example, gives especially probing scrutiny to tax increases, budget cuts, and other austerity measures with disproportionate effects on the minimum core rights of the poor. Similarly, the Court intervened in the healthcare and other sectors in an effort to force the state to expand existing safety nets to the benefit of marginalized groups. These interventions have helped to maintain and improve the quality of life of the neediest without destroying the state’s ability to respond to crisis. Finally, the Colombian experience rebuts important objections to a minimum core approach, formulated by various scholars and by the Constitutional Court of South Africa. Such an approach need not require a court to formulate a minimum entitlement to social rights with exacting and impossible precision, and should be seen as complementary rather than antagonistic to other approaches like proportionality analysis. Further, by targeting judicial review towards vulnerable populations, a minimum core approach may serve as an instrument of judicial restraint rather than of judicial aggrandizement.

Keywords: social rights, socio-economic rights, minimum core, Colombia, austerity measures, economic crisis

JEL Classification: K32, K33, K41

Suggested Citation

Landau, David, The Promise of a Minimum Core Approach: The Colombian Model for Judicial Review of Austerity Measures (July 2013). Economic and Social Rights after the Global Financial Crisis (Aoife Nolan, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2014), Forthcoming; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 644. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2297552

David Landau (Contact Author)

Florida State University - College of Law ( email )

425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
643
PlumX Metrics