Incivility in Online Political Discourse and Anti-Deliberative Attitudes: An Experimental Analysis

43 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2013 Last revised: 4 Jul 2014

See all articles by Bryan T. Gervais

Bryan T. Gervais

University of Texas at San Antonio

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

With the advances in interpersonal communication of the “Web 2.0” era, questions about the importance of civility are perhaps more important than ever. Mass digital interaction between strangers has become an everyday occurrence, bound by few behavioral norms. I argue that the widespread presence of incivility in online political communication limits the deliberative potential of online interactions. To test this hypothesis, I manipulate exposure to uncivil political discourse in an online discussion forum, I find that exposure to disagreeable uncivil political talk induces feelings of anger and aversion, which in turn lead to anti-deliberative attitudes - including reduced satisfaction and willingness to compromise. On the other hand, exposure to like-minded incivility increases the use of uncivil behavior in political comments by message board posters. I discuss why like-minded and disagreeable incivility have different effects, and reflect on what the presence of incivility means for online political discourse.

Keywords: incivility, online discourse, political communication, digital democracy, political psychology

Suggested Citation

Gervais, Bryan T., Incivility in Online Political Discourse and Anti-Deliberative Attitudes: An Experimental Analysis (2013). APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper, American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2301194

Bryan T. Gervais (Contact Author)

University of Texas at San Antonio ( email )

San Antonio, TX
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
195
Abstract Views
1,406
Rank
238,495
PlumX Metrics