The Comparative Politics of Fracking: Networks and Framing in the US and Europe

26 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2013

Date Written: 2013


The extraction of shale gas through hydraulic fracturing (or ‘fracking’) has become one of the most important but also most controversial methods of increasing energy supply this century. While the benefits and risks of fracking are similar in the US and Europe, the process has developed in sharply different ways. Many structural reasons for this difference have been identified, but this study focuses on the role of political actors and agency. Drawing on policy network and framing literature, the paper constructs a framework that is mindful of structural conditions, but pays particular attention to the complex set of actors, interests and images shaping shale gas extraction. It identifies competing (pro- and anti- fracking) networks in the US and Europe, and explores the frames they use to mobilize the public and policymakers. The study finds that while networks on both sides of the Atlantic include similar members and employ similar frames, their ability to mobilize support and shape the fracking agenda varies, as does the resonance of their frames. Explanations for that variance are found in the character of the network, their framing strategies, and how both are shaped by the structural conditions in which networks operate.

Suggested Citation

Bomberg, Elizabeth, The Comparative Politics of Fracking: Networks and Framing in the US and Europe (2013). APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper, American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Available at SSRN:

Elizabeth Bomberg (Contact Author)

University of Edinburgh ( email )

Politics and International Relations
SSPS, George Square
Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 9LD
United Kingdom
(44) + (0)131 6504248 (Phone)


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics