Why Do Juries Decide If Patents are Valid?

75 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2013

Date Written: August 5, 2013

Abstract

For the last two decades, patent lawyers and courts have assumed that the Constitution requires that juries decide whether patents are valid. But that assumption rests on an uncertain foundation. Juries did not decide patent validity during most of American history, and as recently as 30 years ago jury trials in patent cases were quite rare. There is, surprisingly, no precedential decision resolving the Seventh Amendment question. And English practice before 1791 -- the basis for Seventh Amendment jurisprudence -- is ambiguous at best on whether juries must decide patent validity. I argue that if and when the issue is presented to the Supreme Court, the Court is unlikely to find a constitutional right to jury trial on issues of patent validity, and certainly not the broad right of the sort that is now common practice. Removing the jury from most patent validity determinations would change patent litigation in important ways.

Suggested Citation

Lemley, Mark A., Why Do Juries Decide If Patents are Valid? (August 5, 2013). Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2306152. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2306152 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2306152

Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
835
Abstract Views
5,595
rank
27,664
PlumX Metrics