Judicial 'Copying' Does Not Affect Independence or Impartiality: Supreme Court of Canada

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (Oxford), Vol. 8, No. 11, 2013. Also featured in "The Romanian Judges’ Forum Review" (2013), with permission.

11 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2013 Last revised: 11 Jan 2014

Date Written: July 29, 2013

Abstract

Unattributed copying of another’s work is plagiarism. Except when you are a judge. This was the view of a unanimous Supreme Court in Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, 2013 SCC 30. The decision, a medical negligence case, is riddled with copyright implications. This work explores those implications.

Keywords: copyright, moral rights, plagiarism, copying, judges, judicial, independence, integrity, Cojocaru, Supreme Court, Canada, ethics

Suggested Citation

Crowne, Emir, Judicial 'Copying' Does Not Affect Independence or Impartiality: Supreme Court of Canada (July 29, 2013). Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (Oxford), Vol. 8, No. 11, 2013. Also featured in "The Romanian Judges’ Forum Review" (2013), with permission.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2306665

Emir Crowne (Contact Author)

Barrister & Attorney-at-Law ( email )

No Address Available

HOME PAGE: http://www.crownes.ca

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
111
rank
236,460
Abstract Views
723
PlumX Metrics