Regulation of 'Religion' and the 'Religious': The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia

Comparative Studies in Society and History, 2014;56(2):448-478

31 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2013 Last revised: 12 Apr 2014

Yuksel Sezgin

Syracuse University

Mirjam Künkler

Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study

Date Written: August 9, 2013

Abstract

The article compares the strategies through which Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Indonesia have regulated religion and addressed questions of what constitutes “the religious” in the post-independence period. We show that the dominant approach pursued by the Indian state has been one of judicialization, i.e. the delegation of religious questions to the high courts, while in Indonesia it has predominantly been one of bureaucratization, i.e. the regulation of religious affairs through the Ministry of Religious Affairs. Contrary to the expectation that judicialization devitalizes normative conflicts while bureaucratization, more frequently associated with authoritarian politics, just “locks” these conflicts “in,” we show that these expectations have not materialized; indeed, at times, the effects have been reverse. Engaging the literatures on judicialization and on bureaucratization, we argue that what determines the consequences of the policy toward religion is less the choice of the implementing institution (i.e. the judiciary or bureaucracy) than the mode of delegation (vertical vs. horizontal) which shapes the relationship between the policy-maker and the institution implementing it. Bureaucrats, judges and elected politicians in multicultural societies around the world encounter questions of religious nature very similar to those that authorities in India and Indonesia tackle. How they respond to questions of religion and address the challenge of religious heterogeneity has a profound impact on prospects of nation-building and democratization. It is therefore imperative that the consequences of the policy towards religion and even more so the consequences of political delegation be studied more systematically. This includes how outcomes are shaped by the relationship between policy-making and -implementing authority – a relationship that this article shows may be harder to steer for democratic governments than autocratic ones.

Keywords: India, Indonesia, Islam, Hinduism, religion, religious, secularism, bureaucratization, judicialization

Suggested Citation

Sezgin, Yuksel and Künkler, Mirjam, Regulation of 'Religion' and the 'Religious': The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia (August 9, 2013). Comparative Studies in Society and History, 2014;56(2):448-478 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2308072

Yuksel Sezgin (Contact Author)

Syracuse University ( email )

Syracuse, NY 13244
United States

Mirjam Künkler

Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study ( email )

Thunbergsvägen 2
Uppsala
Sweden

Paper statistics

Downloads
116
Rank
196,328
Abstract Views
732