Are Stock Markets Really so Inefficient? The Case of the 'Halloween Indicator'
17 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2013 Last revised: 12 Dec 2013
Date Written: September 2013
Abstract
The old and simple investment strategy “Sell in May and Go Away” (also referred to as the “Halloween effect”) enjoys an unbroken popularity. Recent studies suggest that the Halloween effect even strengthened rather than weakened since its first publication by Bouman and Jacobsen (2002). We implement regression models as well as Hansen’s (2005) “Superior Predictive Ability” test to analyze whether stock markets are really so inefficient. In line with the predictions of market efficiency, our results reject the hypothesis that a trading strategy based on the Halloween effect significantly outperforms.
Keywords: Sell in May, stock market anomaly, bootstrap simulation, statistical inference
JEL Classification: G11, G12, G14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Good Day Sunshine: Stock Returns and the Weather
By David Hirshleifer and Tyler Shumway
-
Winter Blues: A Sad Stock Market Cycle
By Mark J. Kamstra, Lisa A. Kramer, ...
-
The Halloween Indicator, 'Sell in May and Go Away': Another Puzzle
By Ben Jacobsen and Sven Bouman
-
Losing Sleep at the Market: The Daylight-Savings Anomaly
By Mark J. Kamstra, Lisa A. Kramer, ...
-
Are Investors Moonstruck? - Lunar Phases and Stock Returns
By Lu Zheng, Kathy Yuan, ...
-
Lunar Cycle Effects in Stock Returns
By Ilia D. Dichev and Troy D. Janes
-
Rain or Shine: Where is the Weather Effect?
By Ning Zhu and William N. Goetzmann
-
Rain or Shine: Where is the Weather Effect?
By Ning Zhu and William N. Goetzmann
-
By Ben Jacobsen and Wessel Marquering