Buyers' Remorse? An Empirical Assessment of the Desirability of a Legal Career

25 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2013 Last revised: 26 Nov 2014

See all articles by Ronit Dinovitzer

Ronit Dinovitzer

University of Toronto; American Bar Foundation

Bryant Garth

University of California, Irvine School of Law; American Bar Foundation

Joyce S. Sterling

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Date Written: August 13, 2013

Abstract

The literature attacking the value of legal education relies as a rule on the idea that individuals attend non-elite law schools because of optimism bias -- thinking they will get the lucrative corporate jobs deemed necessary to pay off educational debt. They presumably would then get buyers' remorse when their optimism proves unjustified. Drawing on the first two waves of the only longitudinal data on lawyer careers, the After the J.D. Study, the authors examine whether those who began their careers in the year 2000 -- with substantial debt even if not as high as today's graduates -- showed evidence of buyers' remorse about their decision to get a law degree. The evidence indicates that law graduates beyond the most elite were able to pay down their debt at the same rate or better than most elite law graduates. In addition, after seven years of practice the great majority of these lawyers were still satisfied with their decision to become lawyers. In fact, there is no statistically significant difference in reported satisfaction with the decision to become a lawyer when we compare graduates from the higher and lower ranked law schools. And while there is some suggestion that lawyers who reported still owing more than $100,000 after seven years of practice were either ambivalent or dissatisfied with their decision to invest in a legal career, multivariate models show that percent of debt remaining seven-eight years into one's career has no significant relationship with career satisfaction. Thus, in contrast to the dominant story, most respondents irrespective of debt are extremely or moderately satisfied with their decision to become a lawyer. There is no indication in our data that these law graduates feel they made a mistake by choosing to go to law school. The data also show that those most likely to favor eliminating the third year of law school were elite law graduates and attorneys in large corporate law firms -- again a contrast to the dominant story.

Keywords: legal education, legal profession, empirical studies

JEL Classification: I31

Suggested Citation

Dinovitzer, Ronit and Garth, Bryant and Sterling, Joyce S., Buyers' Remorse? An Empirical Assessment of the Desirability of a Legal Career (August 13, 2013). Journal of Legal Education, Vol. 63, November 2013, Forthcoming; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-128; U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-39. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2309587

Ronit Dinovitzer

University of Toronto ( email )

Department of Sociology
Toronto, Ontario
Canada

American Bar Foundation ( email )

750 N. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Bryant Garth (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )

401 E. Peltason Dr.
Ste. 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-7230 (Phone)
949-824-0495 (Fax)

American Bar Foundation ( email )

750 N. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-988-6575 (Phone)
312-988-6579 (Fax)

Joyce S. Sterling

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
303-871-6309 (Phone)
303-871-6378 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
564
Abstract Views
4,490
rank
47,299
PlumX Metrics