Equality of Arms in International Criminal Law: Continuing Challenges

The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law-Critical Perspectives, William A. Schabas, et al., eds., Ashgate, 2013

U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-28

Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-40

40 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2013 Last revised: 14 Oct 2017

See all articles by Charles C. Jalloh

Charles C. Jalloh

Florida International University College of Law

Amy DiBella

Independent

Date Written: September 1, 2013

Abstract

This chapter considers the meaning of “equality of arms” between the prosecution and defense in modern international criminal law. The analysis reveals the disparity between the theory and practice, and shows how this oft mentioned principle in the jurisprudence and the literature is a lofty goal that seems to be applied feebly. The paper starts out by examining how international criminal courts define and apply the phrase in concrete cases, and offers multiple examples of courts shying away from ensuring the substantive equality of the parties in favor of reading the right as a mere procedural guarantee. Following a brief discussion of the link between equality of arms and the right to a fair and public trial, the authors argue that equality of arms is more than a simple fair trial right; it is an expansive institutional entitlement which is impacted by the lack of structural independence of defense offices in all but one international criminal court. The chapter uses the glaring inequality in investigative resources between the prosecution and the defense as a case study to advocate for special attention to the substantive enjoyment of equality of arms during the important investigative stages of such trials. In addition, the authors assess the out-of-court structural and resource inequalities that further stack the deck against defendants. They show how greater prosecution compliance with the statutory duty to collect and disclose both incriminating as well as exculpatory evidence in the permanent International Criminal Court could serve as one mechanism to help improve the substantive position of the defense and the fairness of international criminal trials.

Keywords: Charles Jalloh, equality of arms, international criminal law, criminal law, human rights, criminal defense, procedural guarantees, equality of investigative resources, disclosure, international criminal court, role of the prosecutor as a minister of justice

JEL Classification: K14, K19, K33, K39, K42, K49

Suggested Citation

Jalloh, Charles C. and DiBella, Amy, Equality of Arms in International Criminal Law: Continuing Challenges (September 1, 2013). The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law-Critical Perspectives, William A. Schabas, et al., eds., Ashgate, 2013 ; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-28; Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-40. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2314587

Charles C. Jalloh (Contact Author)

Florida International University College of Law ( email )

11200 SW 8th Street
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.fiu.edu

Amy DiBella

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
423
Abstract Views
1,635
rank
68,625
PlumX Metrics