Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

An Empirical Analysis of Case Outcomes Under the ADA Amendments Act

70 Washington & Lee Law Review, Forthcoming

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-36

41 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2013  

Stephen F. Befort

University of Minnesota Law School

Date Written: August 23, 2013

Abstract

Congress enacted the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) in order to override four Supreme Court decisions that had narrowly restricted the scope of those protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and to provide "a national mandate for the elimination of discrimination." This article undertakes an empirical examination of the impact of the ADAA on case outcomes. The recent reported cases provide a unique opportunity for such an examination since, with the ADAAA not retroactively applicable to cases pending prior to its effective date, courts have been simultaneously deciding cases under both the pre-amendment and post-amendment standards. This study examines all reported federal court summary judgment decisions arising under Title I of the ADA for a forty-month period extending from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2013. The study coded the pre-ADAAA and post-ADAAA decisions for both disability standing determinations and for rulings on whether the plaintiff was qualified for the job in question. These preliminary data show that the federal courts are granting employers a significantly smaller proportion of summary judgment rulings under the ADAAA on the basis of a lack of disability status. In addition, the ADAAA decisions exhibit a greater prevalence of rulings on the issue of whether the plaintiff is a qualified individual. On the other hand, the post-amendment decisions show an increased tendency for the courts to find that the plaintiff is not qualified. While the rate of increase in plaintiff victories on the disability issue is outpacing the rate of increase in plaintiff losses on the qualified issue, the latter phenomenon suggest a continuing judicial unease with disability discrimination claims generally and with reasonable accommodation requests more specifically.

Keywords: Disabilities, Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA Amendments Act

Suggested Citation

Befort, Stephen F., An Empirical Analysis of Case Outcomes Under the ADA Amendments Act (August 23, 2013). 70 Washington & Lee Law Review, Forthcoming; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-36. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2314628

Stephen F. Befort (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota Law School ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
(612) 625-7342 (Phone)
(612) 625-2011 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
268
Rank
94,874
Abstract Views
1,642