This keynote address was delivered at the AALS conference on Property, Poverty, and Immigration in June 2013.
17 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2013 Last revised: 1 Nov 2013
Date Written: June 12, 2013
Both property and immigration are premised on exclusion yet both human rights and democratic norms require us to treat every human being with equal concern and respect. While neither sovereigns nor owners can have completely open borders, they have obligations to respect the human dignity of "the stranger." Biblical sources link the stranger with the poor and develop a version of the Golden Rule that requires both to be accorded "love." The related secular principle of equal concern and respect means that poverty is, in principle, incompatible with the norms of a free and democratic society. That principle is embodied in the constitutional prohibition on titles of nobility which mandates treating every human being as of equal value and importance. While the nobility clauses do not mandate particular policies, they do outlaw treatment that places some as occupying a lower status than others.This has consequences for both immigration and property law, as well as laws and policies designed to alleviate and prevent poverty.
Keywords: property, poverty, immigration, human rights
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Singer, Joseph William, Titles of Nobility: Property, Poverty, and Immigration in a Free and Democratic Society (June 12, 2013). This keynote address was delivered at the AALS conference on Property, Poverty, and Immigration in June 2013. . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2315091 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2315091