Of Contractarians and Bankruptcy Reform: A Skeptical View
13 Pages Posted: 28 Oct 2013
Date Written: 2004
Abstract
In response to Professor Barry Adler’s paper, Bankruptcy Primitives, where he argued that "[b]ankruptcy law could better serve its basic functions with greater freedom of contract both for individual and corporate debtors," this short essay argues that a non-waivable bankruptcy system, with a supervised bankruptcy process, and a non-waivable discharge right, are not only important, but are necessary and essential. In short, this essay seeks to support the proposition that bankruptcy should be a mandatory rule, rather than merely a default rule.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Personal Insolvency Law after the Enterprise Act: An Appraisal
-
Continuity, Change, and Innovation in Emerging Consumer Bankruptcy Systems: Belgium and Luxembourg
-
A Century of Regress or Progress? A Political History of Bankruptcy Legislation in 1898 and 1998
-
The Scope of the Fresh Start in Bankruptcy: Collateral Conversions and the Dischargeability Debate
-
The Relationship between Nonbusiness Bankruptcy Filings and Various Measure of Consumer Debt
-
A Normative Theory of Bankruptcy Law: Bankruptcy as (is) Civil Procedure