Macroeconomic Policy, Redistribution and Democracy
42 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2013 Last revised: 27 Dec 2013
Date Written: August 29, 2013
Abstract
A growing literature concludes that modern democracies have not adopted policies that benefit the majority to the extent predicted by social conflict theory. The most prominent reason is that globalization ties the hands of policymakers, making it hard for them to redistribute. Yet while progressive taxation has declined, we find that redistributive spending is higher in many democracies than would be expected by today's high levels of capital mobility. We also find that democratic countries that tend to appeal to the majority of the population, which we proxy for with the adoption of their own constitution after transition, use redistributive macroeconomic policies as an endrun around fiscal constraints. While popular democracies adopt flexible exchange rates that give them monetary autonomy, exhibit higher levels of inflationary finance, and incur more foreign debt, elite-biased democracies are more restrained. The latter also have smaller governments and engage in lower levels of redistributive spending.
Keywords: Democracy, Redistribution, Globalization
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships
By Carles Boix and Milan Svolik
-
By Scott Gehlbach and Philip Keefer
-
Power-Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes
By Milan Svolik
-
Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty-Competence Trade-Off
By Georgy Egorov and Konstantin Sonin
-
Inequality and Democratization
By Ben W. Ansell and David J. Samuels
-
Authoritarian Elections and Leadership Succession, 1975-2004
By Gary W. Cox
-
By Susan D. Hyde and Nikolay Marinov
-
Policy Uncertainty in Hybrid Regimes - Evidence from Firm Level Surveys
By Thomas Kenyon and Megumi Naoi