Decision Metric for Capital Budgeting: EVA vs DCF

8 Pages Posted: 7 Sep 2013

Date Written: September 5, 2013

Abstract

We compare the concept of Economic Value Added (EVA) with the traditional Discounted Cash Flows (DCF) method of investment appraisal. We find that DCF suffers from dynamic inconsistency and may approve suboptimal investment decisions. In contrast, EVA does not suffer from these shortcomings and is naturally suited to conduct an assessment in line with basic principles of dynamic decision-making. We discuss practical implications of our findings in the context of regulated industries.

Keywords: decision theory, economic profit, price regulation, valuation

JEL Classification: G11, G31, L43, L51

Suggested Citation

Pruzhansky, Vitaly, Decision Metric for Capital Budgeting: EVA vs DCF (September 5, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2321076 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2321076

Vitaly Pruzhansky (Contact Author)

RBB Economics ( email )

London WC1V 7BD
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,108
Abstract Views
3,985
Rank
43,050
PlumX Metrics