Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Sentencing in America, 1975-2025

'Crime and Justice in America, 1975-2025', Michael Tonry (ed.), University of Chicago Press, 2013, Forthcoming

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-44

59 Pages Posted: 5 Sep 2013  

Michael Tonry

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law

Date Written: June 11, 2013

Abstract

American sentencing policy has gone through four stages in the past 50 years. Indeterminate sentencing was followed by a sentencing reform period in which policy initiatives sought to make sentencing fairer and more consistent, a tough on crime period in which initiatives sought to make sentences harsher and more certain, and the current period, which is hard to characterize. Most tough on crime initiatives remain in place, co-existing with rehabilitative and restorative programs that aim to individualize sentencing and programming. Social science evidence was influential in the second period and to a limited degree in the current period. Indeterminate sentencing was broadly compatible with prevailing utilitarian ideas about the purposes of punishment and the sentencing reform period was broadly compatible with retributive ideas. The initiatives of the tough on crime period are difficult to reconcile with any coherent set of normative ideas. Current sentencing policies are a crazy quilt, making it impossible to generalize about prevailing normative ideas or an “American system of sentencing.”

Keywords: sentencing

Suggested Citation

Tonry, Michael, Sentencing in America, 1975-2025 (June 11, 2013). 'Crime and Justice in America, 1975-2025', Michael Tonry (ed.), University of Chicago Press, 2013, Forthcoming ; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-44. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2321174

Michael Tonry (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )

229-19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
416
Rank
57,693
Abstract Views
1,536