Restoring Equity in Right to Work

UC Irvine Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 859, May 2014

UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-137

24 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2013 Last revised: 26 Nov 2014

Catherine Fisk

University of California, Irvine School of Law

Benjamin I. Sachs

Harvard Law School

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

Under United States labor law, when a majority of employees in a bargaining unit chooses union representation, all employees in the unit are represented by the union. Federal law, moreover, requires the union to represent all workers in a bargaining unit equally with respect to both collective bargaining and disciplinary matters. As a general rule, federal law enables unions to require employees to pay for the services that unions are obligated to provide them. Twenty-four states, however, have enacted laws granting union-represented employees the right to refuse to pay the union for the services that federal law requires the union to offer. As such, the intersection of federal labor law and state right to work laws results in a mandate that unions provide services for free to any employee who declines to pay dues.

This paper proposes three approaches to addressing this feature of U.S. labor law. First, the paper argues that under a proper reading of the NLRA states may not prohibit all mandatory payments from workers to unions. In particular, the paper shows that states must permit collective bargaining agreements requiring so-called objectors (or nonmembers) to pay dues and fees lower than those required of members. Second, the paper argues that in right to work states federal law ought to relax the requirement of exclusive representation and allow unions to organize, bargain on behalf of, and represent only those workers who affirmatively choose to become members. This proposal would implement a members-only bargaining regime in right to work states. Third, the paper contends that the NLRB ought to abandon its rule forbidding unions from charging objecting nonmembers a fee for representation services that the union provides directly and individually to them.

Suggested Citation

Fisk, Catherine and Sachs, Benjamin I., Restoring Equity in Right to Work (2014). UC Irvine Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 859, May 2014; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-137. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2325158

Catherine L. Fisk (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )

4800 Berkeley Place
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-3349 (Phone)

Benjamin I. Sachs

Harvard Law School ( email )

1525 Massachusetts Avenue
Griswold 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
533
Rank
41,089
Abstract Views
2,207