Law and Governance as Checks and Balances in Transatlantic Security: Rights, Redress, and Remedies in EU-US Passenger Name Records and the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program

Yearbook of European Law, 2013, pp. 1-21

20 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2013 Last revised: 28 Nov 2013

See all articles by Elaine Fahey

Elaine Fahey

City, University of London - City Law School

Date Written: September 13, 2013

Abstract

The paper assesses the remedies, redress and review mechanisms under two transatlantic Security Agreements since their enactment up to the present day, focussing upon the latest EU-US PNR Agreement and its evolution and the EU-US TFTP Agreement. It is argued that the operation of a plethora of governance mechanisms exposes the hollowness of review, remedies and redress within the Agreements, which do not seem to be mitigated or compensated for by rights or redress provisions, for example, to judicial review. The paper shows that there are significant shortcomings in the operation of the reviews of these two Agreements. The operation of the Agreements emphasise how law and governance mechanisms do not necessarily compensate for each other as checks and balances. Accordingly, they demonstrate reasons that the EU should be particularly cautious about replicating this rule-making in EU law, i.e. in adopting an EU PNR based upon the EU-US PNR and a TFTS, based upon the EU-US TFTP.

Suggested Citation

Fahey, Elaine, Law and Governance as Checks and Balances in Transatlantic Security: Rights, Redress, and Remedies in EU-US Passenger Name Records and the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (September 13, 2013). Yearbook of European Law, 2013, pp. 1-21. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2325544

Elaine Fahey (Contact Author)

City, University of London - City Law School ( email )

Northampton Square
London, London EC1V OHB
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
236
PlumX Metrics