Digital Evidence Gathering in Dawn-Raids -- Judicial Review -- Up-Front or Retrospective?

17 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2013 Last revised: 18 Sep 2013

See all articles by Ingeborg Simonsson

Ingeborg Simonsson

Judge Stockholm City Court; Stockholm University

Date Written: April 4, 2013

Abstract

At what stage in proceedings should there be a right to judicial review when large amounts of data are copied or mirrored electronically during surprise inspections of companies suspected of competition law infringements? Practices are being developed by the Commission and by national authorities to gather digital data and bring it to the competition authority’s premises for extensive analysis. Such analysis includes the use of keywords, indexing and searching mechanisms through forensic software. The process can take anything from a few days to several months.

The General Court judged in Nexans and Prysmian that appeals against such practices were inadmissible at the preliminary-inquiry stage and could only be considered when brought together with an appeal against a final decision in the case. The judgment in Nexans is under appeal. However, recent case-law from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) can be interpreted as following a different path. The problem outlined above can appear not just before the EUCJ but also before Member State courts.

Suggested Citation

Simonsson, Ingeborg, Digital Evidence Gathering in Dawn-Raids -- Judicial Review -- Up-Front or Retrospective? (April 4, 2013). 20th St.Gallen International Competition Law Forum ICF, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2327122

Ingeborg Simonsson (Contact Author)

Judge Stockholm City Court; Stockholm University ( email )

S-106 91 Stockholm
Sweden

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
154
Abstract Views
638
rank
198,340
PlumX Metrics