The Historical, Comparative, and Convergence Trifecta in International Water Law: A Mexico-U.S. Example

5 Pages Posted: 18 Sep 2013

See all articles by Peter L. Reich

Peter L. Reich

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: June 5, 2013

Abstract

Doctrinal disconnects complicate adjudication of international water rights controversies. However, legal history and comparative law sources can fill gaps and build analogies to bridge differences in substantive law. Between Mexico and the United States in particular, the civil-common law divide at times appears vast, but has been occasionally narrowed by reference to shared Roman principles of usufruct or by incorporation of Mexican law into the U.S. system. This article argues that these commonalities can help solve the dispute over the All-American Canal in Southern California, which prior to being lined with concrete by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation recharged groundwater supplying Mexican farmers and the endangered Colorado Delta ecosystem. Such meeting places for doctrine suggest that, even in domestic courts, nations need not attempt to resolve international problems through domestic law alone.

Keywords: Colorado River, groundwater, irrigation, Mexico, Roman law, water law

Suggested Citation

Reich, Peter L., The Historical, Comparative, and Convergence Trifecta in International Water Law: A Mexico-U.S. Example (June 5, 2013). Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2327346

Peter L. Reich (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
Abstract Views
394
rank
363,504
PlumX Metrics