An Overview of the Capital Jury Project for Military Justice Practitioners: Aggravation, Mitigation, and Admission Defenses

The Army Lawyer, July 2011, No. 7, DA PAM 27-50-458

Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-29

12 Pages Posted: 27 Sep 2013

Date Written: July 1, 2011

Abstract

This article takes the findings from the Capital Jury Project (CJP) and applies them to military court-martial practice, taking note of military specific rules and case law that gain new meaning when placed in a CJP-informed context. This article covers themes in aggravation and mitigation and discusses the underlying juror beliefs that drive those themes. Throughout, the article explores how counsel on both sides of a capital court-martial can use these findings to improve their trial practice but pays special attention to how admission defenses address these themes.

Keywords: Capital Jury Project (CJP), aggravation, mitigation, juror belief systems, Military Justice, defenses, non-capital practice, reduced culpability, lack of remorse, loathing, fear

Suggested Citation

Carpenter, Eric, An Overview of the Capital Jury Project for Military Justice Practitioners: Aggravation, Mitigation, and Admission Defenses (July 1, 2011). The Army Lawyer, July 2011, No. 7, DA PAM 27-50-458, Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-29, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2328920

Eric Carpenter (Contact Author)

FIU College of Law ( email )

11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-4560 (Phone)
305-348-7293 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://law.fiu.edu/

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
17
Abstract Views
244
PlumX Metrics