The Power to Decide on Takeovers: Directors or Shareholders, What Difference Does It Make?

72 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2013 Last revised: 15 Dec 2014

Matteo Gatti

Rutgers Law School

Date Written: July 30, 2014

Abstract

I analyze the allocation of the power to decide on hostile takeovers between directors and shareholders. My contribution is to show who actually has power in a takeover and what factors are at work to give such power. Although directors are traditionally considered to be in charge in deciding the outcome of a hostile takeover of a Delaware corporation, shareholders nevertheless may have the power to reverse the outcome via a vote. I argue that even though shareholders sometimes lack the power to determine the outcome of a takeover bid, the reason for that is not embedded in the takeover regime itself, but rather in corporate law rules, principles and/or practices that are external to it and act as barriers to shareholder power. These barriers, which I call “corporate law collateral factors,” include staggered boards, limits to director removability, shareholders’ inability to call special meetings or to act by written consent, supermajority rules, proxy and conflict of interest regimes. This article, which reports original empirical evidence on the number and market capitalization of Delaware companies that are affected by each corporate law collateral factor, argues that scholars and courts have overemphasized the importance of the takeover regime itself rather than the corporate law collateral factors. Policymakers and interpreters should thus address all corporate law collateral factors within the body of takeover law, whether or not statutory. Given the importance of takeovers, it is odd not to conceive tailored rules that acknowledge the existence and impact of such factors. Leaving the corporate law collateral factors in a vacuum to general corporate law does a disservice to takeover players and stakeholders.

Keywords: Takeovers, Defenses, Tender Offers, Market for Corporate Control, Corporate Governance, Directors, Shareholders, Delaware, Board Neutrality Rule, Poison Pills

JEL Classification: D21, G30, G32, G34, K22

Suggested Citation

Gatti, Matteo, The Power to Decide on Takeovers: Directors or Shareholders, What Difference Does It Make? (July 30, 2014). Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, Vol. 1, No. 20, 2014; Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Paper No. 132. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2329891 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2329891

Matteo Gatti (Contact Author)

Rutgers Law School ( email )

NJ
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
370
Rank
64,921
Abstract Views
1,575