Risk Redux: The Resurgence of Risk Assessment in Criminal Sanctioning

25 Pages Posted: 27 Sep 2013 Last revised: 14 Nov 2013

See all articles by John Monahan

John Monahan

University of Virginia School of Law

Jennifer L. Skeem

University of California, Berkeley

Date Written: October 28, 2013

Abstract

After almost four decades of “just deserts,” the past several years have seen a remarkable resurgence of risk assessment as an essential component of criminal sanctioning. In this article, we review current practice in the incorporation of risk assessment into the sanctioning systems of several illustrative states, and describe the major dimensions on which state practices differ. We then elaborate the various meanings ascribed to the foundational concept of “risk” in criminal sanctioning, and contrast “risk” with what are now often called “criminogenic needs,” the fulfillment of which ostensibly reduce an offender’s level of “risk.” Finally, we address the choice of an approach to risk assessment in sentencing, particularly in the resource-starved state of current correctional practice.

Keywords: sentencing, risk, needs, corrections

Suggested Citation

Monahan, John and Skeem, Jennifer L., Risk Redux: The Resurgence of Risk Assessment in Criminal Sanctioning (October 28, 2013). Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2013-36. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2332165

John Monahan (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-3632 (Phone)

Jennifer L. Skeem

University of California, Berkeley ( email )

120 Haviland Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7400
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
611
rank
40,622
Abstract Views
2,492
PlumX Metrics