Social Preferences and Portfolio Choice

73 Pages Posted: 2 Oct 2013 Last revised: 25 Aug 2017

See all articles by Arno Riedl

Arno Riedl

Maastricht University; IZA Institute of Labor Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute); Netspar

Paul Smeets

Maastricht University

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 1, 2017

Abstract

To understand why investors hold socially responsible mutual funds, we link administrative data to survey responses and behavior in incentivized experiments. We find that both social preferences and social signaling explain socially responsible investment (SRI) decisions. Financial motives play less of a role. Socially responsible investors in our sample expect to earn lower returns on SRI funds than on conventional funds and pay higher management fees. This suggests that investors are willing to forgo financial performance in order to invest in accordance with their social preferences.

Keywords: portfolio choice, social preferences, socially responsible investments, mutual funds, administrative investor data, experiment, survey

JEL Classification: G110, D640, C900

Suggested Citation

Riedl, Arno M. and Smeets, Paul, Social Preferences and Portfolio Choice (July 1, 2017). CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4403. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2334641

Arno M. Riedl

Maastricht University ( email )

Department of Economics (AE1)
P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200 MD
Netherlands

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

Netspar ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

Paul Smeets (Contact Author)

Maastricht University ( email )

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200MD
Netherlands
+31433883643 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
220
Abstract Views
1,202
rank
10,244
PlumX Metrics