The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, The Role of International Non-governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society

30 Pages Posted: 14 Nov 2000  

Kenneth Anderson

American University - Washington College of Law

Abstract

Establishment of the Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines was regarded by many international law scholars, international activists, diplomats and international organization personnel as a defining, 'democratizing' change in the way international law is made. By bringing international NGOs - what is often called 'international civil society' - into the diplomatic and international law-making process, many believe that the Ottawa Convention represented both a democratization of, and a new source of legitimacy for, international law, in part because it was presumably made 'from below'. This article sharply questions whether the Ottawa Convention and the process leading up to it represents and real 'democratization' of international law, challenges the idea that there is even such a thing as 'international civil society', at least in the sense that it is democratic and comes 'from below', and disputes that there can be such a thing as 'democratic' processes at the global level. It suggests, by way of alternative, that the Ottawa Convention and the process leading up to it should be seen as a step in the development of global transnational elites at the expense of genuinely democratic, but hence local, processes.

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Kenneth, The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, The Role of International Non-governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society. European Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=233561

Kenneth Anderson (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
382
Rank
62,080
Abstract Views
3,571