23 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2013
Date Written: October 3, 2013
Governments play a significant role in determining how markets function and use a variety of policies for this purpose, including economic regulation, trade policy and antitrust. Some of these policies (i.e. trade policy and antitrust) in principle promote competition directly, but sometimes are too intrusive, while others pursue other general interest objectives and in so doing restrict competition, sometimes beyond what is strictly necessary. While in the last few decades antitrust scholars and practitioners have thoroughly emphasized the role of incentives in achieving optimal economic outcomes, even though actual antitrust enforcement has not always been coherent in this respect, such an understanding does not play a similar role in other policy domains. This paper, by discussing selective, but relevant examples, shows how economic regulation, trade policy, intellectual property and antitrust laws have been applied in recent years without considering the compatibility with proper incentive schemes. Some policy changes and legislation reforms are discussed and suggested.
Keywords: antitrust issues and policy; The Economics of Regulation; Intellectual property rights; Trade Policy
JEL Classification: L4, L51, G34, F130
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Heimler, Alberto, Antitrust Enforcement and Regulation. Different Standards but Incentive Coherent? (October 3, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2335651 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2335651