Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Developing a Framework for Arbitrating Standards-Essential Patent Disputes

29 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2013 Last revised: 27 Sep 2014

Jorge L. Contreras

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

David L. Newman

Loeb & Loeb

Date Written: September 3, 2014

Abstract

A growing chorus of voices is calling for the use of arbitration to resolve disputes concerning standards-essential patents (SEPs). Those advocating the arbitration of SEP-related disputes include academic commentators, government officials and members of the professional bar. Most cite the potential savings of cost and time that arbitration could achieve over the multi-year, resource-intensive lawsuits that currently characterize these disputes. But despite these ringing endorsements, there is surprisingly little guidance available for parties, standards-development organizations (SDOs), and tribunals that wish to implement effective arbitration procedures for these complex disputes.

In this article, we lay the groundwork for the development of such procedures and identify several key areas in which further study and deliberation will be required. We pay particular attention to fundamental questions such as whether SEP arbitration should be mandated by SDOs, which issues should be arbitrated, whether arbitral decisions should be confidential, and what form arbitration proceedings should take. While, at this early stage, we do not purport to answer these difficult questions in a definitive manner, we offer a framework for further discussion that we hope will be useful for policy makers, industry participants and commentators considering these important issues.

Keywords: standards, patent, interoperability, arbitration, ADR, mediation, FTC, Google, FRAND, RAND

Suggested Citation

Contreras, Jorge L. and Newman, David L., Developing a Framework for Arbitrating Standards-Essential Patent Disputes (September 3, 2014). 2014 Journal of Dispute Resolution 23 (2014); American University, WCL Research Paper 2014-20. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2335732

Jorge L. Contreras (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

David L. Newman

Loeb & Loeb ( email )

United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
402
Rank
60,228
Abstract Views
2,435