Challenging the Dogma of Deference: A Review of Terms of Engagement by Clark M. Neily III
30 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2013 Last revised: 21 Jan 2014
Date Written: October 4, 2013
Abstract
This review of Clark Neily's Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution's Promise of Limited Government, examines the theory of rational basis review, and argues that courts should be more vigilant -- and less deferential -- in enforcing constitutional boundaries against legislative overreaching.
Keywords: Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism, Rational Basis Review, Lochner, Clark Neily, Judicial Review
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sandefur, Timothy, Challenging the Dogma of Deference: A Review of Terms of Engagement by Clark M. Neily III (October 4, 2013). Texas Review of Law & Politics, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2335823
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.