Attorney Fees in a Loser Pays System
31 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2013 Last revised: 5 Mar 2014
Date Written: October 6, 2013
Attorney fees fund litigation yet little is known about fees in most cases. Fee data are rarely available in the United States or in English rule, loser pays, jurisdictions. This Article analyzes fee awards in Israel, which vests judges with discretion to award fees, with loser pays operating as a norm. The 2641 cases studied constitute nearly all cases terminated by judgment in district courts in 2005, 2006, 2011, and 2012. Given many fee denials, and fees when awarded being well below client payments to attorneys, the fee system could reasonably be characterized as being more American than English. Fees were awarded to prevailing parties in 72.8 percent of cases. Judges often exercised their discretion to protect losing litigants, especially individuals, from having to pay fees. In tort cases won by individuals against corporate defendants, corporations paid their own fees plus plaintiffs’ fees in 99 percent of the cases; corporate defendants that prevailed in such cases paid their own fees 48 percent of the time. Asymmetry between plaintiffs and defendants existed. In cases with fee awards, the mean and median fee paid to prevailing plaintiffs was 110,000 shekels (NIS) and 31,000 NIS, respectively; the mean and median fee paid to prevailing defendants was 49,000 NIS and 25,000 NIS, respectively. Plaintiffs prevailed in 54.8 of cases between individuals but received 90 percent of the fees. Expected award amounts varied by case category and party status. Fees were significantly correlated with damages recoveries in plaintiff victories and with time on the docket. In contract and property cases, but not in tort cases, fees declined as a percent of recovery as the recovery increased.
Keywords: attorney fees, tort, contract, English rule, American rule, litigation, loser pays, litigation funding
JEL Classification: K10, K11, K12, K13, K40, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation