Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Neutrality Agreements and Article III Standing: Why Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is Nonjusticiable

12 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2013 Last revised: 12 Apr 2014

T. Ward Frampton

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Date Written: October 7, 2013

Abstract

Next month, the Supreme Court will consider whether union-employer "neutrality agreements" run afoul of Section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act. One facet of this dispute, however, has been overlooked: Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is not a "case or controversy" at all. Martin Mulhall, the Florida casino worker hoping to block the enforcement of a neutrality agreement between his employer and Local 355, lacks standing.

Suggested Citation

Frampton, T. Ward, Neutrality Agreements and Article III Standing: Why Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is Nonjusticiable (October 7, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2336677 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2336677

T. Ward Frampton (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )

215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
122
Rank
195,914
Abstract Views
1,598