Download This PaperNeutrality Agreements and Article III Standing: Why Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is Nonjusticiable
12 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2013 Last revised: 12 Apr 2014
Date Written: October 7, 2013
Abstract
Next month, the Supreme Court will consider whether union-employer "neutrality agreements" run afoul of Section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act. One facet of this dispute, however, has been overlooked: Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is not a "case or controversy" at all. Martin Mulhall, the Florida casino worker hoping to block the enforcement of a neutrality agreement between his employer and Local 355, lacks standing.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Frampton, Thomas, Neutrality Agreements and Article III Standing: Why Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall is Nonjusticiable (October 7, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2336677 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2336677
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN