Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Neofeminism

50 Houston Law Review 1325 (2013)

66 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2013 Last revised: 24 Oct 2013

Aya Gruber

University of Colorado Law School

Date Written: April 23, 2013

Abstract

Today it is prosaic to say that “feminism is dead.” Far from being moribund, feminist legal theory is breaking from its somewhat dogmatic past and forging ahead with new vigor. Many modern feminist legal scholars seek innovative ways to better the legal, social, and economic status of women while simultaneously questioning some of the more troubling moves of second-wave feminism, such as the tendency to essentialize the woman’s experience, the turn to authoritarian state policies, and the characterization of women as pure objects or agents. These “neofeminists” prioritize women’s issues but maintain a strong commitment to distributive justice and recognize that subordination exists on multiple axes. In defining “neofeminism,” this Article examines how the troubling nature of certain second-wave feminist principles engendered new schools of feminist thought. It then illustrates this process in the domestic violence law reform context. The Article concludes that recognizing a new and vibrant progressive feminism can counter exaggerated claims of feminism’s demise, the belief that feminism has been devastated by postmodern critique, and the appropriation of the feminist label by conservative women’s groups.

Keywords: Feminism, Domestic Violence, Rape, Sexual Assault, Essentialism, Critical Race Theory

JEL Classification: K19, K14, K42

Suggested Citation

Gruber, Aya, Neofeminism (April 23, 2013). 50 Houston Law Review 1325 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2337649

Aya Gruber (Contact Author)

University of Colorado Law School ( email )

401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
(303) 492-8441 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=325

Paper statistics

Downloads
246
Rank
103,806
Abstract Views
1,034