Why Capital Punishment Violates the Constitutional Law of the United States

36 Pages Posted: 18 Oct 2013  

Michael J. Perry

Emory University School of Law

Date Written: October 17, 2013

Abstract

I explain in this paper why we are warranted in concluding that capital punishment — punishing a criminal by killing him — is both "cruel" and "unusual" within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on "cruel and unusual punishments" and therefore violates the constitutional law of the United States. In setting the stage for that explanation, I discuss the internationally recognized human right not to be subjected to any punishment (or other treatment) that is "cruel, inhuman or degrading.". When I turn to the question of the original understanding of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment, I discuss the important work of John Stinneford, explaining why I concur in Stinneford’s conclusion about the original understanding of "cruel" but dissent from his conclusion about the original understanding of "unusual."

Suggested Citation

Perry, Michael J., Why Capital Punishment Violates the Constitutional Law of the United States (October 17, 2013). Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-259. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2340682

Michael John Perry (Contact Author)

Emory University School of Law ( email )

1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-712-2086 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
255
Rank
97,173
Abstract Views
1,128