Promises, Promises: Vote-Buying and the Electoral Mobilization Strategies of Non-Credible Politicians
38 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
Date Written: October 1, 2013
Abstract
Vote-buying is pervasive, but not everywhere. What explains significant variations across countries in the greater use of pre-electoral transfers to mobilize voters relative to the use of pre-electoral promises of post-electoral transfers? This paper explicitly models the trade-offs that politicians incur when they decide between mobilizing support with vote-buying or promises of post-electoral benefits. Politicians rely more on vote-buying when they are less credible, target vote-buying to those who do not believe their political promises, and only buy votes from those who would have received post-electoral transfers in a world of full political credibility. The enforcement of a prohibition on vote-buying reduces the welfare of those targeted with vote-buying, but improves the welfare of all other groups in society.
Keywords: Politics and Government, Civic Participation and Corporate Governance, Wages, Compensation & Benefits, Political Systems and Analysis, State Owned Enterprise Reform
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Political Economy of Clientelism
By James A. Robinson and Thierry Verdier
-
Democracy, Credibility and Clientelism
By Philip Keefer and Razvan Vlaicu
-
By James A. Robinson and Ragnar Torvik