Misuse and Abuse of the LSAT: Making the Case for Alternative Evaluative Efforts and a Redefinition of Merit

66 Pages Posted: 27 Oct 2013

See all articles by Phoebe A. Haddon

Phoebe A. Haddon

Rutgers University-Camden, Rutgers Law School

Deborah W. Post

Touro College - Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

The authors, who are members of the Society of American Law Teachers (“SALT”), were asked by the Board of Governors of SALT to research and draft a statement on the impact of the LSAT on law school admissions. SALT believes that all law professors can and should participate in a meaningful way in a public discussion of criteria of admission for law school, including the use and possible misuse of the LSAT test. The SALT Statement on the LSAT is appended to this Article. This Article presents a longer and thorough discussion of the many issues raised by the use of the LSAT, GPA, or combination of both as the primary criterion in the admissions process. After exploring the evidence of over reliance and misuse of the LSAT in law school admissions and the institutional constraints that promote these practices, the authors conclude with a list of alternatives, which they believe might ameliorate the worst abuses.

Keywords: LSAT, Law school admissions, standardized test, affirmative action, legal education, minority students

Suggested Citation

Haddon, Phoebe A. and Post, Deborah W., Misuse and Abuse of the LSAT: Making the Case for Alternative Evaluative Efforts and a Redefinition of Merit (2006). 80 St. John's L. Rev. 41 (2006), Touro Law Center Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2341292

Phoebe A. Haddon

Rutgers University-Camden, Rutgers Law School ( email )

Camden, NJ
United States

Deborah W. Post (Contact Author)

Touro College - Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center ( email )

225 Eastview Drive
Central Islip, NY 11722
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
537
rank
426,525
PlumX Metrics