A Comparison between Shale Gas in China and Unconventional Fuel Development in the United States: Health, Water and Environmental Risks
Paolo Davide Farah
West Virginia University (WV, USA); gLAWcal - Global Law Initiatives for Sustainable Development (United Kingdom); University Institute of European Studies - IUSE (Turin, Italy)
gLAWcal - Global Law Initiatives for Sustainable Development; Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) - KoGuan Law School; University of Naples Federico II
October 11, 2013
Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2016
gLAWcal Working Paper Series, IUSE (Turin) Working Paper Series, Paper presented at at the Colloquium on Environmental Scholarship, Vermont Law School, USA, 11th October 2013
China is appraised to have the world's largest exploitable reserves of shale gas, although several legal, regulatory, environmental and investment-related issues will likely restrain its scope. China's capacity to successfully face these hurdles and produce commercial shale gas will have a crucial impact on the regional gas market and on China’s energy mix, as Beijing strives to decrease reliance on imported oil and coal, while attempting to meet growing energy demand and maintain a certain level of resource autonomy. The development of the unconventional natural gas extractive industry will also endow China with further negotiating power to obtain more advantageous prices from Russia and future liquefied natural gas (LNG) suppliers. This paper, adopting a comparative perspective, underlines the trends learned from unconventional fuel development in the United States, emphasizing their potential application to the Chinese context in light of recently signed production-sharing contracts between qualified foreign investors and China. The wide range of regulatory and enforcement problems in this matter are accrued by an extremely limited liberalization of gas prices, lack of technological development, and political hurdles curbing the opening of resource extraction to private investors. These issues are exacerbated by concerns related to the risk of water pollution deriving from mismanaged drilling and fracturing, absence of adequate regulation framework and industry standards, entailing consequences on social stability and environmental degradation.
Note: The most updated version of this paper is published as “A Comparison Between Shale Gas in China and Unconventional Fuel Development in the United States: Water, Environment and Sustainable Development”, 41 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 2, Spring Issue, 2016, pp. 579 – 654. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2802157'>http://ssrn.com/abstract=2802157.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: Shale Gas, Energy Security, Water, Environmental risks, China, United States unconventional gas, energy mix, liquified natural gas, regulatory problems, investments, fracking, fracturing, drilling, pollution, price fixing, lack of technological development, social stability
JEL Classification: N70, N75, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42, Q43, Q48, F1, F13, F40, L95, Q3, Q30, Q32, Q33, Q25
Date posted: October 20, 2013 ; Last revised: July 16, 2016