Justice for All: Reimagining the Internal Revenue Service

57 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2013 Last revised: 21 Oct 2013

David Herzig

Valparaiso University Law School

Date Written: September 21, 2013

Abstract

The ability of the Internal Revenue Service to both collect the tax and enforce the initial determination of tax liability in a neutral and fair manner has been compromised by a February 2011 pronouncement issued by the Department of Justice stating that the President and the Department of Justice believe that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional and that the Department of Justice will no longer defend the statute in courts. The pronouncement results in a disparate treatment of similar taxpayers based solely on the forum of litigation. Through this lens, I examine whether it is proper for the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service to continue to share prosecutorial powers when such results are possible. Assuming that any incremental improvement is desirable as long as it does not harm one person, I conclude that the Department of Justice should have exclusive litigation authority to protect against this very result.

Keywords: IRS, DOJ, DOMA, Nixon, Kennedy, agency power, Justice

Suggested Citation

Herzig, David, Justice for All: Reimagining the Internal Revenue Service (September 21, 2013). Virginia Tax Review, Vol. 33, p. 101, 2013; Valparaiso University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2342366

David Herzig (Contact Author)

Valparaiso University Law School ( email )

656 S. Greenwich St.
Valparaiso, IN 46383-6493
United States
219-465-7809 (Phone)
219-465-7872 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.valpo.edu/law

Paper statistics

Downloads
71
Rank
270,108
Abstract Views
448