Critical Realism and the Austrian Paradox

Martin, Adam. 2009. “Critical Realism and the Austrian Paradox,” Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 33, 517-31

27 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2013

See all articles by Adam G. Martin

Adam G. Martin

Texas Tech University - Free Market Institute

Date Written: October 22, 2013

Abstract

Austrian economics provokes mixed reactions among critical realists. It preaches methodological individualism, marginalism, and rational choice while embracing emergence, open processes, and error. The Austrian school stands paradoxically with one foot each in the mainstream marginalist tradition and heterodox social theory. I argue that this paradox can be disentangled by appeal to the fundamental distinction between the logic of choice and the logic of action. I then extend the analysis of the logic of action to the critical realist account of the basic ontology of social structures, arguing that successful retroduction of social structures depends on marginalist insights.

Keywords: Austrian Economics, Critical realism, Social ontology, Heterodox economics

JEL Classification: B41, B50, B53

Suggested Citation

Martin, Adam G., Critical Realism and the Austrian Paradox (October 22, 2013). Martin, Adam. 2009. “Critical Realism and the Austrian Paradox,” Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 33, 517-31, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2343761

Adam G. Martin (Contact Author)

Texas Tech University - Free Market Institute ( email )

Box 45059
Lubbock, TX 79409-5059
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
Abstract Views
547
Rank
534,335
PlumX Metrics