Plaintiphobia in the Supreme Court

17 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2013 Last revised: 14 Jan 2014

Kevin M. Clermont

Cornell Law School

Theodore Eisenberg

Cornell University, Law School (Deceased)

Date Written: December 26, 2013

Abstract

Through the years debate has raged over whether the Supreme Court’s summary judgment trilogy and Twombly-Iqbal pleading decisions had significant practical effects. To address that question, this article introduces a new empirical measure: the difference between the pretrial-adjudication judgment rates for the defendant and for the plaintiff. Plotting that rates’ difference over time suggests that the cases on summary judgment and pleading, which were far and away the two most major alterations of pretrial disposition during the last three decades, had a markedly anti-plaintiff impact.

Keywords: civil procedure, pleading, summary judgment, empirical

JEL Classification: K40, K41

Suggested Citation

Clermont, Kevin M. and Eisenberg, Theodore, Plaintiphobia in the Supreme Court (December 26, 2013). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 162, No. 7, 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2347360 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2347360

Kevin M. Clermont (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-5189 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)

Theodore Eisenberg

Cornell University, Law School (Deceased) ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
190
Rank
129,848
Abstract Views
1,056