Don't Be Silly: Lawmakers 'Rarely' Read Legislation and Oftentimes Don't Understand It . . . But That's Okay

15 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2013  

Brian Christopher Jones

Liverpool Hope University

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

During the debate over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"), the reading and understanding of legislation became one of the most controversial issues mentioned in Congress and throughout the media. This led many to state that lawmakers should “read the bill,” and led one academic to propose a read-the-bill rule for Congress, where legislators would not vote or vote “no” if they had not read the full text of the legislation. My essay argues that in contemporary legislatures such proposals are unfeasible, and would ultimately produce lower quality legislation. In doing so, the piece uses interviews with legislative insiders (lawmakers, staffers, legal and political journalists) from Congress, Westminster, and the Scottish Parliament to demonstrate that the reading and understanding of legislation are highly overvalued. Additionally, it dispels the notion that the reading and understanding of legislation are larger legislative process or constitutional problems.

Keywords: legislation, bills, acts, reading, understanding, Congress, Westminster, Scottish Parliament, Affordable Care Act, Obamacare

Suggested Citation

Jones, Brian Christopher, Don't Be Silly: Lawmakers 'Rarely' Read Legislation and Oftentimes Don't Understand It . . . But That's Okay (2013). Penn State Law Review, Penn Statim Vol. 118, No. 7, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2347816

Brian Christopher Jones (Contact Author)

Liverpool Hope University ( email )

Taggart Avenue
Liverpool, L16
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.hope.ac.uk/law/

Paper statistics

Downloads
84
Rank
239,588
Abstract Views
888