Governing after the Rights Revolution

Posted: 13 Sep 2000 Last revised: 16 Apr 2010

See all articles by Colin Harvey

Colin Harvey

Queen's University Belfast - School of Law

Date Written: April 14, 2010


In this paper I explore the relevance of neo-republican thinking for current debates in constitutional law. In particular, I am interested in how deliberative forms of law and democracy might be grounded in real-world institutional contexts. My thesis is that the neo-republican model, underpinned as it is by the values of equality, participation, and accountability, has both explanatory and critical potential when exploring the voices, spaces, and processes of constitutionalism. I test this argument with reference to constitutional change in Northern Ireland. It is evident that equality is the core value in the settlement reached, but it is in the combination of values that the potential and tensions will arise in the future. The provisions of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 on equality are useful examples of how law might be shaped to include the voices of affected groups in the process of enforcing change in public administration. Law's role in this process is, however, more problematic than is often assumed. In this, and in other aspects of the settlement, there are lessons for others who are presently reflecting on the constitutional future in the new devolutionary contexts.

Suggested Citation

Harvey, Colin, Governing after the Rights Revolution (April 14, 2010). Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 27, No. 2, June 2000. Available at SSRN:

Colin Harvey (Contact Author)

Queen's University Belfast - School of Law ( email )

School of Law
Belfast BT7 1NN, BT7 1NN

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics