Constitutional Conventions and the Prince of Wales

10 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2013

See all articles by Adam Perry

Adam Perry

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 2013

Abstract

The Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) held in Evans v Information Commissioner that certain correspondence between Prince Charles and government officials must be disclosed under freedom of information legislation. Much of the judgment was devoted to a discussion of the constitutional conventions applicable to Prince Charles, and the case provides a useful example of how conventions and laws can interact. In this note, I argue that the Upper Tribunal misunderstood how conventions are distinguished from one another, and misapplied the test for the identification of conventions.

Keywords: Constitutional conventions, Prince of Wales, freedom of information, norms

Suggested Citation

Perry, Adam, Constitutional Conventions and the Prince of Wales (November 2013). The Modern Law Review, Vol. 76, Issue 6, pp. 1119-1128, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2348944 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12050

Adam Perry (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St Cross Building
St Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
1
Abstract Views
256
PlumX Metrics