Rethinking Notice

11 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2013 Last revised: 12 Nov 2013

Date Written: November 4, 2013

Abstract

The issue addressed in this paper is the standard that reviewing courts should apply when deciding whether changes between a proposal and final rule render the notice inadequate under APA § 553. I have written about this issue before, taking the position that courts should stick closely to the language of § 553, and generally allow agencies great leeway in making changes between proposals and final rules. In this essay, I raise some concerns about my earlier position which have led me to reconsider the issue. In short, there is a good instrumental case to be made against strict adherence to the text of the APA and in favor of requiring a new round of notice and comment when agencies make unanticipated changes to their proposals when promulgating final rules.

Keywords: APA, notice, section 553

JEL Classification: K23

Suggested Citation

Beermann, Jack Michael, Rethinking Notice (November 4, 2013). Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-49, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2349716 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349716

Jack Michael Beermann (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-2577 (Phone)
617-353-3110 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
546
PlumX Metrics