The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate

12 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2013

See all articles by Lela P. Love

Lela P. Love

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Date Written: 1997

Abstract

The ten reasons outlined in this article demonstrate that a mediator’s giving advice, making assessments and stating opinions — particularly where the mediator presses parties to accept a particular opinion, outcome or assessment — are inconsistent with the role of a mediator.

Keywords: Mediation, Evaluative Mediation, Neutrality, Dispute Resolution, ADR

Suggested Citation

Love, Lela P., The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate (1997). 24 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 937 (1997), reprinted in MEDIATION: THEORY, POLICY AND PRACTICE (International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory, 2nd Series) (Ashgate Publishing 2001). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2349757

Lela P. Love (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
(212) 790-0365 (Phone)
(212) 790-0205 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
3,312
rank
2,992
Abstract Views
6,225
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information