Has the Roberts Court Plurality's Colorblind Rhetoric Finally Broken Brown's Promise?

27 Pages Posted: 8 Nov 2013

See all articles by Phoebe A. Haddon

Phoebe A. Haddon

Rutgers University-Camden, Rutgers Law School

Date Written: 2013


This Essay examines the continuing significance of the Keyes decision to the judicial vision of equality and racial isolation in public education. By comparing efforts to promote educational equality from the Keyes era through today, this Essay asserts that the judiciary has wrongly embraced a colorblind interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause. In so doing, courts have impeded the progress of children in Denver and around the country, ignored highly instructive social science studies on the benefits of desegregation, and broken the constitutional promise of equal citizenship. For future policy makers and lawyers to address these persistent problems, legal educators must equip students with tools to reclaim legal conversations about freedom and equaltiy. The author, Dean Phoebe A. Haddon of the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, concludes with recollections of her late aunt, Rachel B. Noel, who played an instrumental part in the evolution of the Keyes case.

Keywords: Keyes v. School District No. 1, equality, race, public education

Suggested Citation

Haddon, Phoebe A., Has the Roberts Court Plurality's Colorblind Rhetoric Finally Broken Brown's Promise? (2013). Denver University Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 5, 2013, p. 1251-, U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-67, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2351431

Phoebe A. Haddon (Contact Author)

Rutgers University-Camden, Rutgers Law School ( email )

Camden, NJ
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics