A Right to Contribution and Federal Restitution Orders

26 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2013 Last revised: 16 Apr 2015

See all articles by Jonathan Hornok

Jonathan Hornok

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: 2013


Amy and Vicky are victims of two of the most widely traded series of child sex-abuse images. The Violence Against Women Act requires courts to order full restitution for these women. However, with millions of dollars in requested restitution and thousands of defendants, the United States courts of appeals are split over whether to interpret the mandatory restitution provision broadly (providing a victim with comprehensive recovery from each defendant) or narrowly (frequently allowing only limited, expensive, and time-consuming recovery from many defendants). Partially motivating this circuit split are courts’ opposing views on whether a defendant has a right to contribution from other victimizers for restitution payments. Without a right to contribution for defendants, these victims must file suits throughout the country asking courts for restitution. This paper argues that, under the Supreme Court’s holdings in Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transportation Workers Union of America, Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc., and Musick, Peeler & Garrett v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, courts should imply a right to contribution for defendants ordered to pay restitution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2259 and 3664. Such an interpretation enables a victim to receive comprehensive restitution and permits a defendant who pays full restitution to seek contribution from other liable defendants.

Keywords: 18 U.S.C. § 2259, 18 U.S.C. § 3664, Northwest Airlines, Transportation Workers Union of America, 451 U.S. 77, Texas Industries, Radcliff Materials, 451 U.S. 630, Musick Peeler & Garrett, Employers Insurance of Wausau, 508 U.S. 286, Paroline, In Re Amy Unknown, 701 F.3d 749, Contribution, Restitution

Suggested Citation

Hornok, Jonathan, A Right to Contribution and Federal Restitution Orders (2013). 2013 Utah Law Review 661, University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 56, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2351524

Jonathan Hornok (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics