Values, Diversity and the Justification of EU Institutions

Political Studies, 57(4), 2009: 828-45

25 Pages Posted: 15 Nov 2013

See all articles by Emanuela Ceva

Emanuela Ceva

University of Pavia, Department of Political and Social Sciences

Gideon Calder

University of South Wales

Date Written: June 22, 2009

Abstract

Liberal theories of justice typically claim that political institutions should be justifiable to those who live under them – whatever their values. The more such values diverge, the greater the challenge of justifiability. Diversity of this kind becomes especially pronounced when the institutions in question are supra-national. Focusing on the case of the European Union, this paper aims to address a basic question: what kinds of value should inform the justification of political institutions facing a plurality of value systems? One route to an answer is provided by John Rawls, who famously distinguishes between comprehensive and political values, and defends the exclusion of the former from the foundations of a political theory of justice. This paper questions the tenability of the Rawlsian solution, and draws attention to an alternative twofold conceptual distinction: that between minimal and non-minimal and between substantive and procedural values. Minimal values are meant to be as independent as possible of controversial conceptions of the good and views of the world, regardless of whether these are comprehensive or purely political. It will be argued that their endorsement may thus further specify the nature of what should be shared in order to justify political institutions in conditions of pluralism. In order to further refine the account of such basis of justification, two variants of minimalism will be presented according to whether they invest substantive or procedural values. Substantive values qualify the property of an outcome; procedural values qualify the property of a procedure. The latter part of the paper consists of a ‘face-off’ between minimal proceduralism and minimal substantivism, considering reasons in favour of the adoption of each. The result, we suggest, is a helpful reorientation of the political dimension of the value debates to which the multiplicity of values amid contemporary European horizons give rise.

Keywords: Political justification, European Union, Pluralism, Minimalism, Proceduralism, Political values, Neutrality

Suggested Citation

Ceva, Emanuela and Calder, Gideon, Values, Diversity and the Justification of EU Institutions (June 22, 2009). Political Studies, 57(4), 2009: 828-45, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2354872

Emanuela Ceva (Contact Author)

University of Pavia, Department of Political and Social Sciences ( email )

Corso Strada Nuova, 65
27100 Pavia, 27100
Italy

HOME PAGE: http://www-3.unipv.it/webdsps/en/docente.php?id=ceva

Gideon Calder

University of South Wales ( email )

Caerleon Campus
Lodge Road
Pontypridd, Wales CF37 1DL
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
347
PlumX Metrics