Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed Groups in Other Situations of Violence: The Syria Example
International Humanitarian Legal Studies 3 (2013), 263-290
Posted: 19 Dec 2013
Date Written: November 1, 2013
In February 2012, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic found that opposition groups fighting against the Assad regime are bound by human rights obligations constituting peremptory norms of international law. This finding is innovative for two reasons. First, human rights obligations apply generally to the vertical relation between States and their subjects. Second, whereas it seems accepted that non-state armed groups can have human rights obligations when they control territory, the Commission of Inquiry was unable to confirm that Syrian opposition forces exercised such control over territory. This article examines whether the finding that non-state armed groups are bound by peremptory human rights norms is supported by contemporary international law. Moreover, recent trends in the practice of the United Nations with regard to human rights obligations of non-state actors will be analysed. Even though this article argues that non-state armed groups can have human rights obligations in other situations of violence, it points out particular challenges to their practical application.
Keywords: Human rights obligations of non-state actors, non-state armed groups, Syria, jus cogens, peremptory human rights norms, other situations of violence, internal strife, Turku Declaration
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation