Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A Q-R Theory
45 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2000
There are 3 versions of this paper
Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A Q-R Theory
Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A Q-R Theory
Date Written: July 2000
Abstract
This paper develops a model of evolving standards for academic publishing. It is motivated by the increasing tendency of academic journals to require multiple revisions of articles and by changes in the content of articles. Papers are modeled as varying along two quality dimensions: q and r. The former represents the clarity and importance of a paper's main ideas and the latter its craftsmanship and polish. Observed trends are regarded as increases in r-quality. A static equilibrium model in which an arbitrary social norm determines how q and r are weighted is developed and used to discuss comparative statics explanations for increases in r. The paper then analyzes a learning model in which referees (who have a biased view of the importance of their own work) try to learn the social norm from observing how their own papers are treated and the decisions editors make on papers they referee. The model predicts that social norms will gradually but steadily evolve to increasingly emphasize r-quality.
Keywords: Academic publishing, journals, social norms, evolution, standards, overconfidence, quality
JEL Classification: A14, D70, C73
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Economics: An Emerging Small World?
By Sanjeev Goyal, Marco van Der Leij, ...
-
By Joel Sobel
-
Empirical Implications of Physician Authority in Pharmaceutical Decisionmaking
By Scott Stern and Manuel Trajtenberg
-
Recent Publishing Trends at the AER, JPE, and QJE
By Stephen Wu
-
By Marco van Der Leij and Sanjeev Goyal
-
By Yann Bramoulle and Gilles Saint-paul
-
Concentration in Knowledge Output: A Case of Economics Journals
By Bino Paul G. D., Subash Sasidharan, ...