The Relationship of Cognitive Effort, Information Acquisition Preferences and Risk to Simulated Auditor-Client Negotiation Outcomes

Kleinman, G., D. Palmon and K. Yoon. The Relationship of Cognitive Effort, Information Acquisition Preferences and Risk to Simulated Auditor-Client Negotiation Outcomes. Group Decisions and Negotiations. (2013, Forthcoming)

Posted: 26 Nov 2013

See all articles by Gary Kleinman

Gary Kleinman

Montclair State University

Dan Palmon

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Accounting & Information Systems

Kyunghee Yoon

Clark University - Graduate School of Management

Date Written: August 21, 2013

Abstract

The auditor-client relationship is a legally-mandated relationship in which one party, the auditor, is hired and paid by the auditee (client) to inform third party stakeholders as to whether the client firm’s financial statements are presented in conformity with national financial accounting standards. When these statements do not meet the criteria for acceptable financial statements, a negotiation situation may arise in which the auditor is presumed to act in the best interests of shareholders and creditors who have no independent knowledge of the auditor’s findings. The client management may then feel forced to defend its numbers. The result is a negotiation between the auditor and client (e.g., Salterio, 2012, Brown and Wright, 2008).

This study examines cognitive factors and risk preference factors that may impact the negotiation both in the setting of each side’s negotiation position and on the outcomes of that negotiation using simulated auditor-client negotiations. Questionnaire and simulated auditor-client negotiations were used to generate the data, with MBA and MS in Accounting students playing the role of client CEOs and auditor partners. We further explore the use of a tool, Structural Equation Modeling, to test the data, in the process highlighting its usefulness in auditor-client negotiation research. We find that the cognitive characteristic of need for cognition is significantly and positively related to achievement of the negotiator's desired income objectives and reported willingness to argue strongly for his/her position. Actively open-minded thinking, a second cognitive variable studied, was not significantly related to success in the negotiations, nor to a reported willingness to argue strongly for his/her position. Finally, we find that perceived aggressive tactics by the other party to the negotiation had a negative impact on the counterpart negotiator's success in the negotiation, and satisfaction with it. As expected, risk assessment-related variables were not related to outcomes of interest.

Keywords: auditor, client, negotiation, role playing, cognitive characteristics, risk preferences, risk assessment, counterpart behaviors, structural equation modeling.

Suggested Citation

Kleinman, Gary and Palmon, Dan and Yoon, Kyunghee, The Relationship of Cognitive Effort, Information Acquisition Preferences and Risk to Simulated Auditor-Client Negotiation Outcomes (August 21, 2013). Kleinman, G., D. Palmon and K. Yoon. The Relationship of Cognitive Effort, Information Acquisition Preferences and Risk to Simulated Auditor-Client Negotiation Outcomes. Group Decisions and Negotiations. (2013, Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2359680

Gary Kleinman (Contact Author)

Montclair State University ( email )

NJ 07043
United States

Dan Palmon

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Accounting & Information Systems ( email )

96 New England Avenue, #18
Summit, NJ 07901-1825
United States
201-648-5472 (Phone)
201-648-1283 (Fax)

Kyunghee Yoon

Clark University - Graduate School of Management ( email )

950 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01610
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,184
PlumX Metrics